Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Peter, What you described is exactly what I was trying to explain. It sure is nice to have others standy by to interpret my ramblings <g>. >This represents quite a complex processing model. It requires a processor >to run through the first few gigabytes of log and then change schemas and >run through the next. I think you would be better with a different file for >each schema change and link them together with XLink/entities. I already have a working prototype that does this and it does not require complex processing model. It just looks complex. >Yup. Let's solve the single schema problem first. Simon? But don't you prefer completely crazy hairball of a problem over simple problems? <G> Thanks for the help. I think I'll continue to kick the hairball on my own just for 'kicks'. Regards, Don xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
