• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <SimonStL@c...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Tue, 4 Aug 98 14:25:42 UT

Ron Bourret writes:
>There doesn't seem to be a way that we can say we want all elements 
>beneath (but not including) the Doc element to be in the IBTWSH namespace.
>Instead, the instance will need to either use a prefix (which we can 
>declare in Doc) or change the default in all elements directly beneath 
>Doc.  Same applies to More.

Looks like we're back to the XSC: prefix, just to stay out of the way of this. 
 That way Doc can declare the IBTWSH null namespace and More the same without 
stomping on themselves.

Reasonable?  Initial implementatoins are such fun...

Simon St.Laurent
Dynamic HTML: A Primer / XML: A Primer / Cookies


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: Re: XSchema Spec - XSchema Element (Sections 2.0 and 2.1), Draft 6
• Next by Date: Re: External DTD Grammar
• Previous by thread: Re: XSchema Spec - XSchema Element (Sections 2.0 and 2.1), Draft 6
• Next by thread: XSchema question
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread