[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
John Cowan wrote: > Tyler Baker scripsit: > > > In the current DOM spec, in the table for NodeValues, the Entity node > > should return null for its node value. Shouldn't it return the value of > > the entity or in the case the entity has not been expanded then return > > null? > > The value of an entity appears as the children of the > Entity node. This can be arbitrarily complex, with Text nodes or Element nodes > or whatever (see the draft); it doesn't make sense to capture it as > a "value" string. > > > Really, an entity with just a name, but no data associated with it is > > pretty useless unless the entity is an external parsed entity where the > > system id and notation name actually have some real relevance. Thanks for the clarification. I suppose an annoted version of the DOM draft would help out a lot of developers such as myself on these sort of questions just like the annotated draft of the XML 1.0 spec that Tim Bray created has helped out a lot of developers already. Tyler xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|

Cart



