• From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
• To: XML Dev <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Thu, 06 Aug 1998 16:07:55 -0400

james anderson wrote:


> if the 19980802 spec were refined to include the requisite mechanism for
> binding prefixes outside of the root element along with the anscilliary
> scoping rules, then this should be possible.

Doubtless, but it doesn't and that's that.  In the DTD, prefixes
are without meaning.

> the implicit pi binding mechanism and dynamic scope rule of the earlier draft
> were, in any event, sufficient.

So they were.  "Dynamic" scope?  More like global scope.
 
Et iterum censeo, local ns definition (as opposed to local
ns *defaulting*, which I applaud) delenda est.

-- 
John Cowan	http://www.ccil.org/~cowan		cowan@c...
	You tollerday donsk?  N.  You tolkatiff scowegian?  Nn.
	You spigotty anglease?  Nnn.  You phonio saxo?  Nnnn.
		Clear all so!  'Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: Namespace Comments (and dtd encoding)
    • From: MURATA Makoto <murata@a...>
  • Re: Namespaces (and validation)
    • From: james anderson <James.Anderson@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XML errors and fatal errors.
• Next by Date: Re: Expanded names are not enough
• Previous by thread: Re: Namespaces (and validation)
• Next by thread: Re: Namespace Comments (and dtd encoding)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread