Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Tim Bray wrote: > > Is > it worthwhile, at this point in history, trying to retroactively > save HTML? Real question. -Tim It is worthwhile: o To support an effort to create a standard for an object-framework that is componentized, incrementally extensible, and competitive at the level of the components o To support standard interfaces into this framework that ensure correct and testable property handling without requiring a reference implementation o To create a conformance test suite that enables developers to know with certainty the level(s) to which they conform to the framework and any data or procedural language it supports. o To create sample implementations for this framework which enable the core framework containers and components to be shared o To pick a set of core languages which are to be supported by all conforming implementations of the object framework Using your collective experience with HTML, XML, VRML, DOM, XSL, XLL, object-centric implementations with middleware standards, you can do this. Or you can work with Microsoft to complete its work toward that end. Len Bullard Intergraph Public Safety xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
