• From: James Clark <jjc@j...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1998 10:12:51 +0700

Dean Roddey wrote:

> So does anyone have any opinions on whether something like XSL will be more
> convenient to
> deal with attributes than elements? Are the semantics of XSL such that one
> would be more easily
> and compactly notated than the other?

We've been trying in XSL to make both equally convenient.

James



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: Newbie Q
    • From: Dean Roddey <roddey@u...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Is XML getting too hard?
• Next by Date: Appendix D XML 1 spec
• Previous by thread: Re: Newbie Q
• Next by thread: XML/RDF for HyperThesauri(sm)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread