• From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
• To: XML Dev <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Fri, 07 Aug 1998 13:14:18 -0400

Chris Maden wrote:

> So, to my reading, if it doesn't match _document_, it isn't XML, and
> is outside the scope of the spec.  The XML spec shouldn't dictate
> error-handling behavior for non-XML objects; otherwise, future
> browsers would be required not to process GIFs, Word documents, HTML,
> etc.  That would be silly.

My point is that it's regrettable that

	<root>This is a broken XML document

does not require a fatal error, whereas

	<root>This is a broken XML document</ROOT>

does, as it violates a specific WFC.

-- 
John Cowan	http://www.ccil.org/~cowan		cowan@c...
	You tollerday donsk?  N.  You tolkatiff scowegian?  Nn.
	You spigotty anglease?  Nnn.  You phonio saxo?  Nnnn.
		Clear all so!  'Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: XML errors and fatal errors.
    • From: Chris Maden <crism@o...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Namespaces and XML validation
• Next by Date: including lists in XML?
• Previous by thread: Re: XML errors and fatal errors.
• Next by thread: How to process Japanese Code with XMLDSO(MS-XML)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread