[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
James Clark wrote: > > Using 'xml:namespace' would mean that a namespace 'foo' was declared > using > > xml:namespace:foo="..." > > which looks very strange to me. as an alternative, xml:namespace="<prefix>:<uri>" would look "normal", would eliminate the xmlns "namespace", and would avoid the anomaly of having the prefix value itself encoded as a name. as i would prsume that this rather mundane option must have been eliminated in the deliberation process, i ask whether there is some intended advantage to the proposed prefix binding mechanism? xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|

Cart



