Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
On Tue, 4 Aug 1998, John Cowan wrote: > > How do other parsers deal with this? A PEReference preprocessor? A > > preprocessor is hard, because what your preprocessing depends on the > > results of the actual processing that would occur after the preprocessor > > finished. > > Why so? Because you can use a PEReferences to form a PEDecl, and you need to have processed a PEDecl before a PEReference to it can be processed. So I can't just scroll (unidirectionally) through a whole document just processing PEReferences, because I need to have processed the PEDecl's for those first, and I cant just scroll through processing PEDecl's, because they could be created using PEReferences. All I am saying is that this is hard, not easy. --- Chris Hubick mailto:chris@h... http://www.hubick.com/ xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
