Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Martin Bryan wrote: > > Let me see if I can suffer the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune and > pose you all a question: "Why do compound documents need to be validated as > a whole?" > my minimum concern is to be able to default attributes. > ... > > If I create my document fragments using the relevant DTDs, I validate them > against those DTDs, not against a compound DTD. Once they have been > validated against the DTD I can import them into a compound document as > already validated fragments. i am working with document entities in which "references" are made to elements from various sources. if they use enabling architectures, then the mixed references are within a single tag. > > ... > > Why does this group seem to feel there is an overpowering need to develop a > DTD that can be used to validate the compound structure, rather than its > individual fragments? it's actually the defaults i'm after. xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
