Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
At 05:48 PM 8/10/98 -0400, Steven Champeon wrote: >Does using a non-standard workaround for a bug in one's *markup* make a >desire for fully compliant *implementations* null and void? I don't think >it does. Steven and Murray are each entitled to their opinion. On top of which, as of this morning, the pages at the WSP site all start like so: <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/loose.dtd"> and they validate. And if they don't that's a high-update-rate bug and they'll be fixed. And (I can say this since I had no input into their design) they look damn good too, on a wide variety of browsers. -Tim xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
