• From: "Frank Boumphrey" <bckman@i...>
• To: "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@c...>, <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1998 09:15:21 -0400

>I would observe in defense of the XSL draft that it is the first
>public working draft, whereas the DOM is a PR whose first working
>draft was out roughly a year ago.  You're comparing unripe apples to
>oranges . .

Henry,

Point taken , after all we can't exactly claim that the four previous
rewrites of the DOM spec were models of clarity !<grin>

Frank

-----Original Message-----
From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@c...>
To: <xml-dev@i...>
Date: Wednesday, August 19, 1998 5:36 AM
Subject: Re: DOM Level 1 Proposed Recommendation



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: Re: Is XML getting too hard?
• Next by Date: Re: Is XML getting too hard?
• Previous by thread: Re: DOM Level 1 Proposed Recommendation
• Next by thread: XSL implementation available
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread