• From: len bullard <cbullard@h...>
• To: Frank Boumphrey <bckman@i...>
• Date: Thu, 13 Aug 1998 20:39:34 -0500

Frank Boumphrey wrote:
> 
> It struck me that it may be preferable to default every thing to the global
> attributes, and provide a means of exempting elements that we do not wish
> them to apply to.

Because I haven't read DCD yet, but will, take this with a grain of
salt:   
this has the same awful feeling that putting include declarations on
SGML 
DTD root element type declarations with excludes in branches did.  Very 
messy if convenient at times.

len

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • DCD and Global attributes.
    • From: "Frank Boumphrey" <bckman@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Java class != XML entity
• Next by Date: RE: DCD and Global attributes.
• Previous by thread: DCD and Global attributes.
• Next by thread: RE: DCD and Global attributes.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread