• From: james anderson <James.Anderson@m...>
• To: XML Dev <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1998 00:12:32 +0200

John Cowan wrote:
> 
> Tim Bray scripsit:
> 
> 
> > Gosh, it's nice to have you here to interpret.  If we were going to
> > do that, then you couldn't have namespaces on the root element;
> 
> Not using the draft's machinery, anyhow.  A PI could put a namespace
> on the root element.
> 

Agreed.

The declaration is for "content only". A second declaration form for "self +
content" is not necessary. Either the PI form or the method of putting pseudo
attributes on "physical-entity-specific" declarations is sufficient. For the
former method, the PI should be permitted in external entities in addition to
within the prologue, in order to afford the necessary control over declarations.

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: wd-xml-names: resolve the element name in the scope of its containing element.
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
  • Re: wd-xml-names: resolve the element name in the scope of its containing element.
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>

• Prev by Date: HL7 vs X12 w/XML
• Next by Date: Re: Dynamic vs. indefinite extent
• Previous by thread: Re: wd-xml-names: resolve the element name in the scope of its containing element.
• Next by thread: Re: wd-xml-names: resolve the element name in the scope of its containing element.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread