• From: Chris Hubick <maillist@c...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1998 09:11:05 +0000 (GMT)

On Tue, 18 Aug 1998, Jon Knight wrote:

> On Tue, 18 Aug 1998, Peter Murray-Rust wrote:
> > The idea of bundling up many files - promoted by David Megginson - is an
> > exciting one. If I could be assured that I could send a jar file to a
> > client
> 
> Does a *.jar file imply that XML is getting tightly bound to Java?

	For starters I think this is all HTTP 1.1's job, it provides 
persistant connections, and the framework for compression.  As for Jar
files, they are just zip files with a different extension and a manifest
file included.

---
Chris Hubick
mailto:chris@h...
http://www.hubick.com/




xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: Is XML getting too hard?
    • From: Jon Knight <jon@n...>

• Prev by Date: DOM Node.cloneNode()
• Next by Date: Re: Is XML getting too hard?
• Previous by thread: Re: Is XML getting too hard?
• Next by thread: Re: Is XML getting too hard?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread