Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Charles Frankston wrote: > > Mr. Anderson -- > > To answer the first of your many questions: > > Yes, a syntax virtually identical to yours, that allowed multiple namespace > declarations in a single attribute was considered. The resulting syntactic > problems swayed the WG away from that approach. (Some of the issues -- you > now need an internal quoting mechanism, or a careful proscription on the > legal characters in a URI, in order to allow proper separation of the pairs. > It gets even messier to come up with a syntax to declare the default > prefix.) xml is already sufficiently baroque, that i can only presume that this was not the deciding argument. :) > > I couldn't understand most of the rest of your questions. i surmise (from the timestamp on your message) that you are actually refering here to my other posting re dtd encoding... if the questions were not understandable, then i must have misunderstood something basic about the draft's intentions. let my try again by simply posing the open question: could someone please post a "complete document" (that is including a dtd) for the third example in section 5 of the draft (the one with the root element "bk:book")? thanks. xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
