• From: MURATA Makoto <murata@a...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Tue, 21 Jul 1998 15:52:25 +0900

Chris Maden wrote:
> 
> Correct.  The production reflects the SGML reality that -- ends a
> comment.  In SGML terms:

A readable version is as below:

Comment ::= '<!--'  (Char* - (Char* '--' Char*) - (Char* '-'))   '-->'

This is idential to 

Comment ::= '<!--' ((Char - '-') | ('-' (Char - '-')))* '-->'

Again, I did the comparison with Grail.

Makoto
 
Fuji Xerox Information Systems
 
Tel: +81-44-812-7230   Fax: +81-44-812-7231
E-mail: murata@a...

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: A different comment syntax question
    • From: Chris Maden <crism@o...>

• Prev by Date: Re: A different comment syntax question
• Next by Date: Re: [Q] How should SAX support Namespaces?
• Previous by thread: Re: A different comment syntax question
• Next by thread: Re: A different comment syntax question
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread