• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <SimonStL@c...>
• To: "Xml-Dev (E-mail)" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Sun, 26 Jul 98 16:05:10 UT

Carl Hage proposed:
>Though it's not as important for AttValue to be an element, I think for 
>improved extensibility and the ability to attach documentation, <AttValue> 
>should be restored, with Doc? added, e.g.
>
> <!ELEMENT XSC:AttDef (XSC:Doc?, XSC:More?, XSC:EnumerationValue*, 
> XSC:AttValue?)>
>
> <!ELEMENT XSC:AttValue Doc?>

I'd add XSC:More as well, of course...

Right now the AttValue is an attribute, not a subelement.  This is handier for 
typing, but less convenient for documentation.  Opinions?

More to come...

Simon St.Laurent
Dynamic HTML: A Primer / XML: A Primer / Cookies


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: XSchema Finalization - Element Declaration Containers (1)
• Next by Date: Re: XSchema Finalization - Element Declaration Containers (1)
• Previous by thread: XSchema Finalization - Element Declaration Containers (1)
• Next by thread: RE: Publishing on XML-DEV (was Re: XCatalog proposal draft 0.1 [From Murray Altheim])
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread