• From: rbourret@d... (Ron Bourret)
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1998 09:39:12 +0200

Currently, SetParser in ParserFilter accepts a single parser.  I think this 
should be a Stack of parsers.  Each ParserFilter would set its own parser to the 
top parser on the stack, pop that off, and pass the rest of the Stack to the 
next level down.  This would allow the application to build a stack of 
ParserFilters, each performing a different operation.

-- Ron Bourret

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: ParserFilter suggestion
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>

• Prev by Date: How do browsers (IE4.01) trap XML streams coming from server?
• Next by Date: RE: How do browsers (IE4.01) trap XML st
• Previous by thread: How do browsers (IE4.01) trap XML streams coming from server?
• Next by thread: Re: ParserFilter suggestion
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread