Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
At 16:36 24/07/98 -0400, John Cowan wrote: >Lars Marius Garshol scripsit: > >> I have to agree with the others speakers on this: >> - SO Catalogs should be supported for backward compatibility >> - XCatalogs are to be preferred over SO Catalogs, since they >> limit the number of syntaxes one has to learn > >I agree too, but didn't want to prejudice the opinions of the >XML-DEVers. But you are allowed to lead gently... :-) > >> I have now implemented support both for SO Catalogs and the XML >> version of XCatalogs in xmlproc 0.50, which I released earlier >> today. The support is still rather experimental, and does not >> handle entry conflict resolution correctly. > >I propose something one week, rough consensus emerges the next >week, and working code a week or two later: such is the Internet >freeware development community. Peace, it's wonderful! I totally agree. And so long as everyone is prepared for the inevitable times when things don't go as hoped for - not failures, but experiments - it's a tremendous experience. Mind you, Hofstadter's law still applies. > [... Hofstadter's frog snipped ...] P. Peter Murray-Rust, Director Virtual School of Molecular Sciences, domestic net connection VSMS http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/vsms, Virtual Hyperglossary http://www.venus.co.uk/vhg xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
