• From: rbourret@d... (Ron Bourret)
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Wed, 29 Jul 1998 14:35:30 +0200

John Cowan wrote:
> "In the DTD iff in the instance" is certainly true.  The application
> need not use them if it uses something similar to my namespace
> prefix remapper.  Perhaps I should have an ability to declare a
> prefix to be attached to unprefixed names, but I don't really see
> the point of it.

I was going to suggest such a function (a prefix for unprefixed names), but then 
realized I didn't know what the rules were.  For the moment, leave it out and 
let applications implement it locally if they want to -- it's not difficult.  In 
the future, it might be a nice backward compatibility tool.

-- Ron Bourret


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: Re: SAX: two alternatives for namespaces
• Next by Date: Re: SAX: parser features (was SAX: two alternatives for namespaces)
• Previous by thread: Re: Namespaces: prefixes vs. no prefixes
• Next by thread: Validating : error code vs. Exception ?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread