• From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
• To: XML Dev <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1998 16:38:47 -0400

Ron Bourret scripsit:

> One other difference I'd like to point out is that, with the exception of the
> "escape character" entities (lt, gt, amp, quot, and apos), I don't think you can
> construct an XML file with parsed entities that you cannot construct without
> them.

Actually, they too can be "compiled out" by clever use of character
references:  see the table in clause 4.6 of XML 1.0.

> This is not true of unparsed entities.  Not only would an UnparsedEntity
> element rectify this problem, it would also solve the validation problem pointed
> out by John Cowan with respect to ENTITY attributes: we can't validate their
> value without unparsed entity declarations.

Okay, I'm convinced.  (Note also that SAX supports them.)

How about:

<!ELEMENT UnparsedEntityDef>
<!ATTLIST UnparsedEntityDef
	Name CDATA #REQUIRED
	SystemLiteral CDATA #REQUIRED
	PubidLiteral CDATA #IMPLIED
	Notation CDATA #REQUIRED>

-- 
John Cowan	http://www.ccil.org/~cowan		cowan@c...
	You tollerday donsk?  N.  You tolkatiff scowegian?  Nn.
	You spigotty anglease?  Nnn.  You phonio saxo?  Nnnn.
		Clear all so!  'Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • XSchema: unparsed entities
    • From: rbourret@d... (Ron Bourret)

• Prev by Date: Re: [Q] How should SAX support Namespaces?
• Next by Date: Re: XSchema Spec - Attribute Declarations (Section 2.4), Draft 5
• Previous by thread: XSchema: unparsed entities
• Next by thread: SAX questions
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread