Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
I posted some observations from my use of XML-Data to define fairly large grammers to microsoft.public.xml a few days ago. I have just become aware of XScheme from the recent announcement here and since it doesn't express inheritance, 2 out of the 3 suggestions don't apply (allowing element types that exist only for inheritance to be defined as pure virtual (that is not to be used in file definition or show up in editors) and allowing to define a group as all elements that inherit from an particular superclass). I think the remaining one might be useful (or possibly already discussed here). I have been using some JavaDoc-like comments in my XML-Data definitions to automatically generate HTML documentation for the document content. I have had my XML-Data to DTD converter modified to produce the HTML documentation at the same time as it builds the DTD. I haven't been making a distinction between regular comments and processed comments and have only been using @see and @example formulations. Between minimal comments and information in the schema, it is able to do a reasonably good job documenting how to use the schema. Has any body else been doing anything in this area? xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
