• From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
• To: XML Dev <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Mon, 13 Jul 1998 10:27:27 -0400

Toby Speight wrote:

> This worries me a little.  What's the purpose of FONT?  It's being
> dropped from HTML (i.e. it's only in the "transitional" version of
> HTML 4), so why create a legacy that will need supporting later?

FONT has been removed from IBTWSH 4.0 in favor of BIG and SMALL,
which really mean "important" and "unimportant", but there are
no structural tags for these.

-- 
John Cowan	http://www.ccil.org/~cowan		cowan@c...
	You tollerday donsk?  N.  You tolkatiff scowegian?  Nn.
	You spigotty anglease?  Nnn.  You phonio saxo?  Nnnn.
		Clear all so!  'Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • XSchema Spec - Extensions (Section 2.6), Draft 2
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <SimonStL@c...>
  • Re: XSchema Spec - Extensions (Section 2.6), Draft 2
    • From: Toby Speight <tms@a...>

• Prev by Date: A question about the Mika's question
• Next by Date: Re: <XML:SCRIPT>
• Previous by thread: Re: XSchema Spec - Extensions (Section 2.6), Draft 2
• Next by thread: Re: XSchema Spec - Extensions (Section 2.6), Draft 2
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread