• From: Jeffrey Ricker <ricker@x...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Fri, 17 Jul 1998 21:02:54 -0400

Has anyone given any thought to XML file extensions?

I know that the !DOCTYPE instructions tells the processor what kind of
document it is, but I can't see expecting the file operating system to go
that far. The extension ".xml" does not seem to be used much. We see
instead things like ".cdf". I can not imagine that it is feasible to allow
every document type (DTD) its own file extension. 

Perhaps we could have a double layer of file extensions. The last extension
would be ".xml" preceded by an extension for the document type. For
example, "mymetadata.rdf.xml" and "mychannelinfo.cdf.xml". These SECONDARY
file extensions could be 2, 3, or 4 letters. 

Perhaps XML-valid HTML documents could be "mypage.html.xml"? On second
thought, that's probably silly.

 Any ideas out there, kids?




Jeffrey Ricker
ricker@x...

XMLSolutions, LLC
601 Pennsylvania Ave.
Suite 900, South Bldg.
Washington, DC 20004
202.434.8379

http://www.xmls.com


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: EDI
• Next by Date: XSchema evaluation period - upcoming
• Previous by thread: EDI
• Next by thread: XSchema evaluation period - upcoming
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread