• From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• To: <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Tue, 9 Jun 1998 02:51:45 +1000

> [Scott Vanderbilt]
> > Also, if anyone is aware of what progress is being made by the W3C
> > towards adoption of XSL as a recommendation, that information would
> > be appreciated as well.

I think Chris Maden's own article "Problems with Dynamically Assembled
Document Portions, and Some Solutions" at
	http://www.oreilly.com/people/staff/crism/transclu.html
might give some indication of where XSL might be headed. I am not an XSL
insider, but I would guess that the article raises issues that the XSL & the
XPtr WGs find important.



Rick Jelliffe


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XSL Processors?
    • From: Chris Maden <crism@o...>

• References:
  • Re: XSL Processors?
    • From: Chris Maden <crism@o...>

• Prev by Date: Re: SAX compatibility & WF parsing questions
• Next by Date: Re: XSL Processors?
• Previous by thread: Re: XSL Processors?
• Next by thread: Re: XSL Processors?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread