• From: "Michael Kay" <M.H.Kay@e...>
• To: "Xml-Dev" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Mon, 8 Jun 1998 13:52:39 +0100

>It is often convenient for XML documents to have a bit of
>documentation somewhere in them... Using HTML-compatible
elements
>and attributes allows the documentation to be passed
straight
>through to HTML renderers.
>
Yes indeed, very useful.

In my application I also want to use XML-tags within the
documentary text, e.g. a <SURNAME> tag within the text of an
<LI> element, but that doesn't reduce the usefulness of what
you are offering.

I am trying to understand how I would use namespaces to
allocate a prefix to the HTML-derived tags, and I confess
myself baffled by the specs, in particular the concept of
"schema" which the namespaces proposal relies on. If I
incorporate the itsy-bitsy DTD into my own DTD using
parameter entities as suggested, have I lost the ability to
use prefixes for its tags? If not, is there some other way
of combining the two DTD's?

Mike Kay


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: RE: Extending XML
• Next by Date: Re: draft-whitehead-mime-xml-04
• Previous by thread: Re: The Itsy Bitsy Teeny Weeny Simple Hypertext DTD
• Next by thread: Comments on VHG DTD 1.0alpha
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread