• From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
• To: XML Dev <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Thu, 25 Jun 1998 18:02:44 -0400

Simon St.Laurent wrote:

> Right now the DTD contains ONLY XSC:Doc (when I remember the namespace prefix)
> elements for extension.  The DTD I'm working with uses only the
> itsy-bitsy-HTML elements for that area.  To me, this seems inadequate for many
> purposes, like data typing elements.  (For straight documentation, I think
> it's great.)

Doc was definitely intended for documentation only.  I have thoughts
on extensibility, but no time to write them up today: hopefully
tomorrow.

-- 
John Cowan	http://www.ccil.org/~cowan		cowan@c...
	You tollerday donsk?  N.  You tolkatiff scowegian?  Nn.
	You spigotty anglease?  Nnn.  You phonio saxo?  Nnnn.
		Clear all so!  'Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • RE: extensibility in XSchema?
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <SimonStL@c...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Markup Language Journal and Markup Technologies Conference
• Next by Date: Configuration files (was Re: IBM XML for Java 1.0.0)
• Previous by thread: RE: extensibility in XSchema?
• Next by thread: Re: extensibility in XSchema?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread