• From: Paul Prescod <papresco@t...>
• To: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
• Date: Mon, 15 Jun 1998 15:21:52 -0400 (EDT)

On Mon, 15 Jun 1998, John Cowan wrote:

> However, consider an extension to XSchema syntax that allowed one
> to tag (with ID attributes) various XSchema elements and then to
> refer to them using empty XLink elements.
> 
> In aid of this, I am PROPOSING that we not use any ID attributes
> in XSchema 1.0; change the "id ID #REQUIRED" attributes in ElementDecl
> elements to "name NMTOKEN #REQUIRED" instead.  That will allow us
> to reserved XML IDs for structure-sharing.

I like this idea.

 Paul Prescod


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • XSchema: existing ID attributes considered harmful (was: XSchema Spec Section 2.2, Draft 1)
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>

• Prev by Date: Minor nit to XSchema 2.3.7
• Next by Date: unsubscribe
• Previous by thread: XSchema: existing ID attributes considered harmful (was: XSchema Spec Section 2.2, Draft 1)
• Next by thread: Re: XSchema Spec Section 2.2, Draft 1
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread