• From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
• To: "Tim Bray (Textuality)" <tbray@t...>, "Dave Hollander (Hewlett-Packard Company)" <dmh@c...>, Microsoft <"Andrew Layman"@locke.ccil.org>
• Date: Wed, 10 Jun 1998 13:20:29 -0400

The namespace draft allows PI targets, but not notations, to be
qualified with namespace prefixes.  A notation declaration, however,
is the only standard way in which a PI target can be predeclared.
Thus, the following is not allowed:

<?xml:namespace ns='http://whoever.dom/whatever' prefix='ww'?>
<DOCTYPE foo [
	<NOTATION ww:do-it SYSTEM 'http://whoever.dom/whatever/do-it'>
    ]>
<?ww:do-it ...?>

yet this seems entirely reasonable.  What was the reasoning behind
forbidding qualified names in notation declarations?

-- 
John Cowan	http://www.ccil.org/~cowan		cowan@c...
	You tollerday donsk?  N.  You tolkatiff scowegian?  Nn.
	You spigotty anglease?  Nnn.  You phonio saxo?  Nnnn.
		Clear all so!  'Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: RE: PROPSAL: XSchema declarations and constraints
• Next by Date: RE: PROPSAL: XSchema declarations and constraints
• Previous by thread: RE: PROPSAL: XSchema declarations and constraints
• Next by thread: regarding RDF
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread