• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Mon, 01 Jun 1998 17:15:32 -0700

At 11:34 PM 6/1/98 UT, Simon St.Laurent wrote:
>Does it seem reasonable to proceed, keeping a lookout for RDF without chaining 
>ourselves to its (apparently unstable) syntax?

Well, assuming you don't invest too much time crafting details of
syntax; it seems to me that the most valuable outcome of this discussion
is what needs to be in next-gen schemas and how they are to be used. -Tim


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: Re: XSchema Question 1: RDF
• Next by Date: Re: XSchema Question 1: RDF
• Previous by thread: Re: XSchema Question 1: RDF
• Next by thread: RE: XSchema Question 1: RDF
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread