• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <SimonStL@c...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Wed, 10 Jun 98 14:35:44 UT

Chris Maden wrote:
>I believe XSC:id to be redundant; by default, an attribute is assumed
>to belong to the element on which it is found.  Attributes should only
>need qualification when they're somehow foreign to the element type,
>as global attributes (like xml:lang) are.

Do you mean that the namespace prefix XSC is redundant?  (I agree it probably 
is, though the namespaces spec uses QName in ATTLIST declarations.)  Or you 
mean that the whole id thing is pointless?  It's currently used for content 
models, not just attributes.

Thanks,
Simon St.Laurent
Dynamic HTML: A Primer / XML: A Primer / Cookies


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XSchema Spec Section 2.2, Draft 1
    • From: Chris Maden <crism@o...>

• Prev by Date: RE: XSchema Spec, Section 1.0 (Draft 2)
• Next by Date: PROPSAL: XSchema declarations and constraints
• Previous by thread: Re: XSchema Spec Section 2.2, Draft 1
• Next by thread: Re: XSchema Spec Section 2.2, Draft 1
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread