• From: "Don Park" <donpark@q...>
• To: <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Wed, 3 Jun 1998 05:51:07 -0700

>All of which leads me to wonder if is there an (as yet undiscovered) way to
>represent XML content models in XML without using the basic structure:

Frankly, I would like to see separate definitions for each element,
attributes, and containment rules.  I hated nested procedures in Pascal so I
hate having to define objects inside another definition.  Same thing
happened with XSL where they mixed pattern definition and action rules
together so that patterns nor rules can't be shared.

Other than that, I am enjoying the stampede.

Don Park
http://www.docuverse.com/personal/index.html



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XSchema: multiple proposals
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
  • Pre- and Post-conditions (was RE: XSchema: multiple proposals)
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>

• Prev by Date: ANN: Free-DOM 0.2.3 released
• Next by Date: LISTADMIN: Daily digests instead of weekly ones?
• Previous by thread: Reusing/referencing partial XSchemas (was: XSchema: multiple ...)
• Next by thread: Pre- and Post-conditions (was RE: XSchema: multiple proposals)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread