• From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
• To: XML Dev <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Wed, 10 Jun 1998 11:41:22 -0400

John E. Simpson wrote:

> IMO "syntax" is too general a name for the second (meta-)attribute. How
> about something like "nameclass"?

My point was that ID, IDREF, and ENTITY have the same syntax
(Names), and so do IDREFS and ENTITIES (lists of Names).

> (Sorry if this is off-subject or a misreading of what you were saying...
> wasn't able to keep up with all the XSchema stuff over the last week or so.)

No more have I, no more have I.

-- 
John Cowan	http://www.ccil.org/~cowan		cowan@c...
	You tollerday donsk?  N.  You tolkatiff scowegian?  Nn.
	You spigotty anglease?  Nnn.  You phonio saxo?  Nnnn.
		Clear all so!  'Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: Entities in XSchema
    • From: "John E. Simpson" <simpson@p...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XSchema Spec Section 2.2, Draft 1
• Next by Date: Re: Roots of the DTD
• Previous by thread: Re: Entities in XSchema
• Next by thread: XSchemas and DTDs
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread