• From: rbourret@d... (Ron Bourret)
• To: xml-dev@i..., SimonStL@c...
• Date: Tue, 2 Jun 1998 13:36:44 +0200

Simon St. Laurent wrote:

> At this point, I'd say no to internal XSchemas, if only because sorting out 
> those details will take a long time and considerable debate.  It would also 
> require us to find some way of hiding the internal XSchemas from non-XSchema 
> aware processors, something I'm not fond of.

I agree with Simon.  I can't think of anything you can do with an internal 
XSchema that you can't do with an external XSchema, so including them in 1.0 
just means having to wrangle over a bunch of rules for resolving duplicate 
XSchemas.  With the recent partial validation discussions, this gets even 
uglier...

-- Ron Bourret

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: Re: XSchema Question 2: Namespaces
• Next by Date: Re: XSchema Question 2: Namespaces
• Previous by thread: Re: XSchema Question 3: Internal/External subsets
• Next by thread: Re: XSchema Question 3: Internal/External subsets
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread