• From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Thu, 11 Jun 1998 02:36:19 -0400 (EDT)

Paul Prescod wrote:

> The XLink group has decided not to explicitly support
> ID/IDREF, so we should probably follow their lead. Of course XLink is
> still under development, so that part of the XSchema spec. should probably
> just be left out for now.

Do you have inside information on this?  The published XPointer draft
encourages the use of ID, because it provides an unambiguous
set of anchors; indeed, ID is supported directly, whereas other
attribute values are supported only through the general attribute
machinery.

-- 
John Cowan					cowan@c...
		e'osai ko sarji la lojban.

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Entities in XSchema
    • From: Paul Prescod <papresco@t...>

• References:
  • Re: Entities in XSchema
    • From: Paul Prescod <papresco@t...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XSchema Spec Section 2.2, Draft 1
• Next by Date: Re: Entities in XSchema
• Previous by thread: Re: Entities in XSchema
• Next by thread: Re: Entities in XSchema
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread