Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
[Paul Prescod:] > I believe that through a careful agreement upon and application of > definitions, we can get rid of most complaints about the namespaces > proposal and remove all overlap between that proposal and things > like architectural forms and XSchemas (under development). If that's true, then that's GREAT! However, I keep stumbling over a problem in my own mind. (Maybe it's just too obvious for me to see it.) Using your defined terms, please explain the usefulness and/or purpose -- in terms of how it furthers the cause of reliable, vendor-neutral information interchange -- of declaring that a real or conceptual object exists, in the absence of any interchangeable definition of what that object is, or what constraints it must conform to in order to be processable. -Steve -- Steven R. Newcomb, President, TechnoTeacher, Inc. srn@t... http://www.techno.com ftp.techno.com voice: +1 972 231 4098 (at ISOGEN: +1 214 953 0004 x137) fax +1 972 994 0087 (at ISOGEN: +1 214 953 3152) 3615 Tanner Lane Richardson, Texas 75082-2618 USA xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
