• From: "Don Park" <donpark@q...>
• To: <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Sun, 31 May 1998 16:23:20 -0700

Tim,

>Hmm, this line of thought may be perpetuating what I see as one of
>the shortcomings of DTDs, namely that the DTD has to describe the
>whole document, i.e. a class of languages.  What about partial
>validation/constraints?  I think it's important that child-of-DTD
>support compond documents & partial validation.  So in the terms above,
>maybe these things define sets of elements and attributes, rather
>than whole documents. -Tim

Also, in the realm of persistant data streams (i.e. TV), there is no way for
DTD to be updated by inlining DTD.  I can not add new elements or change
containment rules once the stream has started without shutting down the
broadcast and restarting again.

I guess this sort of falls into the question of "is a document always
finite?".  A document that takes an entire day to process is practically
infinite in my opinion.

Don Park
http://www.docuverse.com/personal/index.html



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Next by Date: Re: What are schemata
• Next by thread: Re: What are schemata
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread