• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• To: <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Mon, 25 May 1998 22:27:06 -0700

Dear xml-dev'ers.

I should point out that XSD is different from SAX in that it was pretty clear
that no W3C or other body was going to get into the stream-oriented API 
business.  Thus SAX was unclaimed territory.  The schema picture is different;
it is near-certain that the XML WG or some other W3C organ *is* going to,
before too long, start emitting working drafts for some sort of a schema
facility.

That said, I think the discussions you are having (in particular Paul
Prescod's manifesto of a couple of days ago) are tremendously useful.

 -Tim


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: Re: W3C XML activities
• Next by Date: SGML/XML 98 Paris, another take
• Previous by thread: Re: XSD: Proposed Goals
• Next by thread: Re: XSD: Proposed Goals
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread