[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Michael Kay writes:
> Since there is a full range of setX() methods, and given the
> general usefulness of having a default constructor e.g. for
> JavaBeans / ActiveX,
> should this omission be rectified?
Yes. Thanks for pointing this out.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson ak117@f...
Microstar Software Ltd. dmeggins@m...
http://home.sprynet.com/sprynet/dmeggins/
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|

Cart



