[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: David Megginson <ak117@f...>
  • To: "Michael Kay" <M.H.Kay@e...>
  • Date: Fri, 1 May 1998 08:52:25 -0400

Michael Kay writes:

 > Since there is a full range of setX() methods, and given the
 > general usefulness of having a default constructor e.g. for
 > JavaBeans / ActiveX,
 > should this omission be rectified?

Yes.  Thanks for pointing this out.


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson                 ak117@f...
Microstar Software Ltd.         dmeggins@m...
      http://home.sprynet.com/sprynet/dmeggins/

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member