• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• To: alex@v...,xml-dev@i...
• Date: Fri, 08 May 1998 18:25:30 -0700

At 06:17 PM 5/8/98 -0700, alex@v... wrote:
>Currently, validating parsers are the only real *safe* bet.

Whatever the limitations of the SDD, this statement is simply
false.  There are many useful applications for non-validating
processors; in fact, I suspect, a very large majority of XML
apps. -Tim


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: SDD again
    • From: alex@v...

• Prev by Date: Re: SDD again
• Next by Date: Re: SDD again
• Previous by thread: Re: SDD again
• Next by thread: Re: SDD again
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread