• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Sun, 31 May 1998 13:00:55 -0700

>> | So is a schema a function that maps a document to a truth value?
>>
>> I'd rather say that it is a definition of a set of documents, just as
>> a formal language is usually considered to be the set of sentences
>> that are well-formed in that language.

Hmm, this line of thought may be perpetuating what I see as one of
the shortcomings of DTDs, namely that the DTD has to describe the
whole document, i.e. a class of languages.  What about partial
validation/constraints?  I think it's important that child-of-DTD
support compond documents & partial validation.  So in the terms above,
maybe these things define sets of elements and attributes, rather
than whole documents. -Tim


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: What are schemata
    • From: Peter Murray-Rust <peter@u...>

• Prev by Date: RE: What are schemata
• Next by Date: RE: What are schemata
• Previous by thread: Re: What are schemata
• Next by thread: RE: What are schemata
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread