• From: Trevor Jenkins <tfj@a...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Fri, 1 May 1998 09:48:07 +0000 (GMT)

> I have created a mailing list, "xml-litprog-l", for discussions
> about how best to use XML/XSL/XLink/XPtr for constructing literate
> programming frameworks and tools.  I'm interested in being able to
> share ideas with
> (i) people who know more about XML and/or SGML than I do;
> (ii) people who know more about literate programming than I do;
> (iii) anyone else who is interested.

What a good idea. Back in 1985/6 I proposed that the ISO Technical 
Report "Techniques for Using SGML" include an example of Literate 
Programming! Some of the other committee members prefered a Z 
example. I gave way to their "pressure" and forgot the literate 
programming example; no one provided the Z example either.

There are some things in SGML that would mean existing web files 
could have been processed whereas they could not be processed with 
XML.

Regards, Trevor.

--

<>< Re: deemed

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Announce: xml-litprog-l
    • From: "Anthony B. Coates" <tony@e...>

• Prev by Date: Announce: xml-litprog-l
• Next by Date: Re: SAX 1.0beta: Three bugs so far
• Previous by thread: Announce: xml-litprog-l
• Next by thread: Re: SAX 1.0beta: Three bugs so far
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread