• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <SimonStL@c...>
• To: "Xml-Dev (E-mail)" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Sat, 30 May 98 16:41:10 UT

In some of Peter's latest examples, he's used 'traditional' general entities. 
I like the results, but don't know that this belongs in the official spec.

Question:
Should the use of traditional DTD entity (and other) notation be encouraged in 
the design, development, and use of XSchemas?

-------------------

Keep in mind that XSchema 1.0 is not itself providing entity services.

I think in the long run, entity services will be provided by a non-XSchema and 
non-DTD mechanism. For now, though, we need to be able to interoperate. Peter 
suggested a separate 'note' - I think this is a good idea.

Simon St.Laurent
Dynamic HTML: A Primer / XML: A Primer / Cookies


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XSchema Question 4: XML 1.0/XSchema interactions
    • From: Peter Murray-Rust <peter@u...>

• Prev by Date: att="s&eacute;1"
• Next by Date: XSchema Question 3: Internal/External subsets
• Previous by thread: att="s&eacute;1"
• Next by thread: Re: XSchema Question 4: XML 1.0/XSchema interactions
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread