• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <SimonStL@c...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Thu, 28 May 98 17:09:18 UT

Dan Brickley wrote:

>If [9] is to mention metadata, it might be worth ammending [11] to 
>explicitly say "regarding XML and the RDF data model." (or "RDF metadata"
>or similar phrase).  

You're right about this, though it's an issue I had hoped to avoid at this 
stage of the game.  The kind of metadata we've been talking about here is 
descriptive information - documentation - not the more complete information 
RDF provides.  Nonetheless, I don't want collisions.

This will be one of the key questions asked in the next phase of the 
discussion.  I consider RDF one of the "W3C recommendations regarding XML" and 
don't think this needs to be stated explicitly.  Others may feel differently, 
and I'd like to hear suggestions.

Simon St.Laurent
Dynamic HTML: A Primer / XML: A Primer / Cookies


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: XSD: Proposed Goals, Rev. 3
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XSD: Proposed Goals, Rev. 3
• Next by Date: Re: XSD: Proposed Goals, Rev. 3
• Previous by thread: Entities and namespaces in XSchemata
• Next by thread: RE: XSD: Proposed Goals, Rev. 3
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread