• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Fri, 08 May 1998 13:50:44 -0700

At 10:38 PM 5/8/98 +0200, Jarle Stabell wrote:
>I would love to see empty end tags making it into the standard in the 
>future.

Speaking as one of those who opposed this, now I agree with you.  
Among other things, perl is going to have a built-in parser so no 
matter how D the PH is, this problem is just invisible.  But it
was a good decision at the time. -T.


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: Re: SDD bogus
• Next by Date: RE: A little wish for short end tags (Was: RE: SDD bogus)
• Previous by thread: Re: A little wish for short end tags (Was: RE: SDD bogus)
• Next by thread: RE: A little wish for short end tags (Was: RE: SDD bogus)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread