Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
I just want to clear something up about reading the XML productions. Am I correct in the following assumptions: A character or sequence of characters between single quotation marks, e.g., 'ABC' is to be represented literally. There must be no space characters between the quotation marks and the entity in the production. So def ::= ' ABC ' would not be legal for representing " ABC " .. you'd need to use SP 'ABC' SP. However, when spaces do exist between the quotation marks, then the name(s) inside are to be treated as productions and the *quotation marks* as literals. For example: abc ::= 'ABC' ; literally ABC lit ::= ' abc ' ; literally ' ABC ' lit ::=' ABC ' ; undefined? Is this correct? Adam mailto:adam@c... xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
