[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: Dan Brickley <Daniel.Brickley@b...>
  • To: xml-dev@i...
  • Date: Thu, 28 May 1998 17:27:00 +0100 (BST)



> 9. XSD shall include mechanisms for extending the information included in 
> SDDs to support metadata.

> 11. The XSD specification will comply with and be consistent with W3C 
> recommendations regarding XML.


> Modifications:
> 
> 9 - added "to support metadata".  Paul's description of possibly dangerous 
> extensions is convincing.  I'm not sure "to support metadata" is enough, but 
> I'm not sure how better to phrase it.  I think prescribing extension limits is 
> something that will have to be done in the body of the document.

If [9] is to mention metadata, it might be worth ammending [11] to 
explicitly say "regarding XML and the RDF data model." (or "RDF metadata"
or similar phrase).  

Dan



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member