• From: Bryan Gilbert <Bryan_Gilbert@p...>
• To: "'xml-dev@i...'" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Mon, 11 May 1998 08:47:40 -0700

	Yes don't forget that XML is meant 
for Humans too.  Short end tags are a pain 
when there is lots of intermediate text.  
	C programmers are familar with this 
when they have to deal with nested 
#ifdef #endif statements: the #endif part 
is a short end tag. 
	For non-C programmers consider trying
to find out which start tag </> belongs
to after you have read pages and pages
of text.


So the best solution is the current solution: each
start tag has a complete matching end tag. IMHO

Bryan Gilbert

PS Formerly I wanted short end tags for embedded 
processors but human readability is more important
to me.


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: A little wish for short end tags (Was: RE: SDD bogus)
    • From: james anderson <James.Anderson@m...>

• Prev by Date: XML parser in C++
• Next by Date: SAX Parsers - standalone
• Previous by thread: Re: A little wish for short end tags (Was: RE: SDD bogus)
• Next by thread: Re: A little wish for short end tags (Was: RE: SDD bogus)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread