[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: "John E. Simpson" <simpson@p...>
  • To: "Xml-Dev (E-mail)" <xml-dev@i...>
  • Date: Sat, 30 May 1998 09:14:37 -0400

At 09:42 AM 5/30/98, Peter Murray-Rust wrote:
[...]
>greetings.xsc
><!DOCTYPE xschema SYSTEM xschema.dtd [
><!ENTITY greetings.content "#PCDATA">
>]>
><xschema>
>  <ElementType id="greetings">
>    <Content>
>      <Seq repeatable="no" optional="no">&greetings.content;</Seq>
>    </Content>
>  </ElementType>
></xschema>

Question: I'd understood XSchema to be an attempt to eliminate the need to
do *any* DTD coding. If that's the case, why define general entities using
the DTD form? Wouldn't some thing like this work?:

<!DOCTYPE xschema SYSTEM xschema.dtd>
<xschema>
  <Entities>
    <EntityType id="greetings.content" repltext="#PCDATA"/>
  </Entities>
  <ElementType id="greetings">
    <Content>
      <Seq repeatable="no" optional="no">&greetings.content;</Seq>
    </Content>
  </ElementType>
</xschema>

That is, why not abstract entity declarations into XSchema form as well as
the element declarations?

John E. Simpson			| It's no disgrace t'be poor,
simpson@p...		| but it might as well be.
					| 		-- "Kin" Hubbard

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member